May 13, 2024

The court has given Craig Wright the last three days to provide documents on Satoshi Nakamoto's bitcoins

Australian entrepreneur Craig Wright must provide documents confirming hisinformation about his history of ownership of 1.1 million BTC owned by the creator of bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto. This decision was made on Monday, March 13, by the District Court of the Southern District of Florida.

Thus, Judge Beth Bloom rejected the Australian's arguments about the inadmissibility of the disclosure of this information for the reason that it is protected by lawyer secrets.

KLEIMAN vs WRIGHT April 13, 2020 by ForkLog on Scribd

Relatives of the late David Kleiman claim half of the 1.1 million bitcoins that Wright should have access to if he actually mined them, hiding under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

court over 11 thousand requested documents, referring to marital and attorney secrets, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a debate regarding the legality of these arguments.

Judge Bruce Reinhart had already ruled in March ordering Wright to provide the required documents, but Wright's attorneys secured another hearing, which took place on Monday.

По его итогам судья Бет Блум согласилась с by a previous decision of his colleague, who considered not inspiring a document submitted for consideration from a lawyer from Kenya, Denis Bosire Mayak, who introduced himself as Wright's attorney, including the blind Tulip Trust.

Bruce Rhinehart also considered the confirmation of the protection of Wright's interests by a Kenyan lawyer dubious, saying that they could have been created by anyone with access to a text editor and pen.

As Bloom pointed out, Judge Rhinehart is correctdecided that the information requested from Wright was not protected by attorney-client privileges. She also expressed bewilderment in connection with Wright's position, according to which the court should indiscriminately accept all the materials of the defendant.

Earlier this week, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator withdrew an honor and dignity lawsuit against Blockstream CEO Adam Back and paid his legal fees in full.